Opening an index created by a newer Lucene major throws IllegalArgumentException ('indexCreatedVersionMajor is in the future') instead of IndexFormatTooNewException
Finding LFV-120Area: index / SegmentInfos commit read (forward version check)Priority: lowImpact: wrong errorNovelty: known outside Lucene
AI-assisted finding, confirmed by automated checks, not yet triaged by a human Lucene committer. This site files nothing upstream.
What it shows
You open, with an older Lucene, an index that a newer Lucene major created, for example Lucene 9.12.3 opening an untouched index written by 10.5.2 with DirectoryReader.open or new IndexWriter. You expect IndexFormatTooNewException, whose javadoc says it 'is thrown when Lucene detects an index that is newer than this Lucene version', which is what you get when the newer release also bumped the segments_N format number. Instead SegmentInfos.readCommit hands the on-disk created major to the public SegmentInfos(int) constructor, whose argument check throws an unchecked IllegalArgumentException 'indexCreatedVersionMajor is in the future: 10', with a suppressed CorruptIndexException that says 'checksum passed ... possibly transient resource issue, or a Lucene or JVM bug'.
Expected vs actual
- Expected: You expect IndexFormatTooNewException, whose javadoc says it 'is thrown when Lucene detects an index that is newer than this Lucene version', which is what you get when the newer release also bumped the segments_N format number.
- Actual: SegmentInfos.readCommit hands the on-disk created major to the public SegmentInfos(int) constructor, whose argument check throws an unchecked IllegalArgumentException 'indexCreatedVersionMajor is in the future: 10', with a suppressed CorruptIndexException that says 'checksum passed ... possibly transient resource issue, or a Lucene or JVM bug'.
Files
Run it
- Tested on Lucene main e1faeba08bde (2026-11-02): still reproduces.
- Tested on Lucene main ea57360912ed (2026-10-24): reproduced.
- How to read the outcome: a failing test is the finding reproducing (the failure message states expected against actual).
- Seeds: a rerun with the same seed replays the same random choices. Assertions off (-da -dsa -Dtests.asserts=false) is the production-like setting.
# Lucene checkout at the tested commit, built with: ./gradlew --no-daemon assemble (JDK 25)
LUCENE=/path/to/lucene; V=12.0.0-SNAPSHOT
CP=$LUCENE/lucene/core/build/libs/lucene-core-$V.jar
CP=$CP:$LUCENE/lucene/codecs/build/libs/lucene-codecs-$V.jar
CP=$CP:$LUCENE/lucene/test-framework/build/libs/lucene-test-framework-$V.jar
CP=$CP:randomizedtesting-runner-2.9.2.jar:junit-4.13.2.jar:hamcrest-3.0.jar # test-framework dependencies (Maven Central)
CP=$CP:junit-platform-console-standalone-6.1.3.jar # JUnit Platform console launcher (Maven Central)
javac -d classes -cp "$CP" $(find src -name '*.java')
# run 1: assertions on, seed DEADBEEF
java -ea -esa --add-modules jdk.incubator.vector --enable-native-access=ALL-UNNAMED -Dtests.seed=DEADBEEF \
-cp "classes:$CP" org.junit.platform.console.ConsoleLauncher \
execute --select-class org.apache.lucene.index.TestOpenIndexFromNewerMajor
Gradle alternative: copy the test into the matching module's src/test/ tree of the checkout and run ./gradlew -p lucene/<module> test --tests <class> -Ptests.seed=<seed> (add -Ptests.asserts=false for a run without assertions).
Feedback
Open an issue in lucene-ai-bug-hunt. Please do not open issues or pull requests in apache/lucene about this finding unless a Lucene committer agrees it should be filed.
Snapshot of 2026-11-04. AI-assisted; not yet triaged by a human Lucene committer. Feedback: open an issue in lucene-ai-bug-hunt.