(Latent) FixedBitSet.approximateCardinality returns a negative value for bit sets of 2^31-63 bits or more, because its scale factor 64 * numWords overflows int
Finding LFV-133Area: util / FixedBitSet (approximateCardinality)Priority: lowImpact: minorNovelty: new
AI-assisted finding, confirmed by automated checks, not yet triaged by a human Lucene committer. This site files nothing upstream.
What it shows
You create a FixedBitSet of 2^31-63 to 2^31-1 bits (for example new FixedBitSet(Integer.MAX_VALUE), a legal length: the class javadoc points to LongBitSet only for more than 2.1B bits), set some bits and call approximateCardinality(); you expect a non-negative estimate of the number of set bits, as BitSet documents ('an approximation of the cardinality of this set'). Instead it returns a negative number (-2147418112 with all 2^31-1 bits set, -64 with a single set bit), because the scale factor (interval / rangeLength) * numWords / maxWord is computed in int and its product 64 * numWords wraps to Integer.MIN_VALUE once the set has 2^25 words; new BitDocIdSet(bits) then throws IllegalArgumentException 'cost must be >= 0'. No Lucene code path builds a bit set that long (doc-ID sets stop at IndexWriter.MAX_DOCS = 2^31-129 bits), so only external code that uses FixedBitSet directly over another int domain is affected.
The test shows that FixedBitSet.approximateCardinality() returns a negative number for a set of Integer.MAX_VALUE bits, because its scale factor 64 * numWords is computed in int and wraps at 2^25 words.
Expected vs actual
Expected: a non-negative estimate (one bit is set). Actual: -64, with -ea and -da.
Files
Run it
- Tested on Lucene main e1faeba08bde (2026-11-02): still reproduces.
- Tested on Lucene main 645d4fe14a20 (2026-10-28): reproduced.
- Recorded outcome of run 1 on Lucene main 645d4fe14a20: 1 test(s) run, 1 failed.
- How to read the outcome: a failing test is the finding reproducing (the failure message states expected against actual).
- Seeds: a rerun with the same seed replays the same random choices. Assertions off (-da -dsa -Dtests.asserts=false) is the production-like setting.
# Lucene checkout at the tested commit, built with: ./gradlew --no-daemon assemble (JDK 25)
LUCENE=/path/to/lucene; V=12.0.0-SNAPSHOT
CP=$LUCENE/lucene/core/build/libs/lucene-core-$V.jar
CP=$CP:$LUCENE/lucene/codecs/build/libs/lucene-codecs-$V.jar
CP=$CP:$LUCENE/lucene/test-framework/build/libs/lucene-test-framework-$V.jar
CP=$CP:randomizedtesting-runner-2.9.2.jar:junit-4.13.2.jar:hamcrest-3.0.jar # test-framework dependencies (Maven Central)
CP=$CP:junit-platform-console-standalone-6.1.3.jar # JUnit Platform console launcher (Maven Central)
javac -d classes -cp "$CP" $(find src -name '*.java')
# run 1: assertions on, seed DEADBEEF
java -ea -esa --add-modules jdk.incubator.vector --enable-native-access=ALL-UNNAMED -Dtests.seed=DEADBEEF \
-cp "classes:$CP" org.junit.platform.console.ConsoleLauncher \
execute --select-class org.apache.lucene.util.TestFixedBitSetApproximateCardinalityOverflow
Gradle alternative: copy the test into the matching module's src/test/ tree of the checkout and run ./gradlew -p lucene/<module> test --tests <class> -Ptests.seed=<seed> (add -Ptests.asserts=false for a run without assertions).
Formal models and scripts this finding's part of the hunt used: bitsets-livedocs-acceptdocs
Feedback
Open an issue in lucene-ai-bug-hunt. Please do not open issues or pull requests in apache/lucene about this finding unless a Lucene committer agrees it should be filed.
Snapshot of 2026-11-04. AI-assisted; not yet triaged by a human Lucene committer. Feedback: open an issue in lucene-ai-bug-hunt.