IndexWriter#hasDeletions ignores committed soft deletes in segments the writer has not pooled, so a writer reopened on an index whose only deletions are soft deletes (or one that took such segments through addIndexes(Directory)) answers false, and true once an NRT reader is opened
Finding LFV-460Area: index / IndexWriter statistics (soft deletes)Priority: lowImpact: minorNovelty: new
AI-assisted finding, confirmed by automated checks, not yet triaged by a human Lucene committer. This site files nothing upstream.
What it shows
You configure a soft-deletes field, soft-delete a document (softUpdateDocument, or updateDocValues on that field), commit, close, and open a new IndexWriter on the index; you expect hasDeletions() to return true, because its javadoc says 'Returns true if this index has deletions', IndexWriterConfig#setSoftDeletesField says a soft-deleted document 'is treated as if it has been hard-deleted through the IndexWriter API', and the same writer's getDocStats() counts the deleted document (maxDoc 2 and numDocs 1 in the repro). Instead it returns false, with -ea and -da, until DirectoryReader.open(writer) puts the segment into the reader pool; after that the same call on the unchanged index returns true. The loop over committed segments uses SegmentCommitInfo#hasDeletions() (delGen != -1, hard deletes only), while the buffered and pooled branches of the same method count soft deletes; the one-line fix is info.getDelCount(softDeletesEnabled) > 0.
The test shows that with a soft-deletes field, a document soft-deleted by softUpdateDocument and committed makes a newly opened IndexWriter answer hasDeletions() == false, while the same writer's getDocStats() counts the deleted document.
Expected vs actual
Expected true (getDocStats maxDoc=2, numDocs=1); actual false (expected:<true> but was:<false>), with -ea and -da.
Files
Run it
- Tested on Lucene main e1faeba08bde (2026-11-02): still reproduces.
- Tested on Lucene main 645d4fe14a20 (2026-10-28): reproduced.
- Recorded outcome of run 1 on Lucene main 645d4fe14a20: 1 test(s) run, 1 failed.
- How to read the outcome: a failing test is the finding reproducing (the failure message states expected against actual).
- Seeds: a rerun with the same seed replays the same random choices. Assertions off (-da -dsa -Dtests.asserts=false) is the production-like setting.
# Lucene checkout at the tested commit, built with: ./gradlew --no-daemon assemble (JDK 25)
LUCENE=/path/to/lucene; V=12.0.0-SNAPSHOT
CP=$LUCENE/lucene/core/build/libs/lucene-core-$V.jar
CP=$CP:$LUCENE/lucene/codecs/build/libs/lucene-codecs-$V.jar
CP=$CP:$LUCENE/lucene/test-framework/build/libs/lucene-test-framework-$V.jar
CP=$CP:randomizedtesting-runner-2.9.2.jar:junit-4.13.2.jar:hamcrest-3.0.jar # test-framework dependencies (Maven Central)
CP=$CP:junit-platform-console-standalone-6.1.3.jar # JUnit Platform console launcher (Maven Central)
javac -d classes -cp "$CP" $(find src -name '*.java')
# run 1: assertions on, seed DEADBEEF
java -ea -esa --add-modules jdk.incubator.vector --enable-native-access=ALL-UNNAMED -Dtests.seed=DEADBEEF \
-cp "classes:$CP" org.junit.platform.console.ConsoleLauncher \
execute --select-class org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterHasDeletionsSoftDeletes
Gradle alternative: copy the test into the matching module's src/test/ tree of the checkout and run ./gradlew -p lucene/<module> test --tests <class> -Ptests.seed=<seed> (add -Ptests.asserts=false for a run without assertions).
Feedback
Open an issue in lucene-ai-bug-hunt. Please do not open issues or pull requests in apache/lucene about this finding unless a Lucene committer agrees it should be filed.
Snapshot of 2026-11-03. AI-assisted; not yet triaged by a human Lucene committer. Feedback: open an issue in lucene-ai-bug-hunt.