DateRangePrefixTree prints a date range whose end is the last year of a thousand- or million-year block (a year X999, or 2 BC) with that end shown as the block's FIRST year, e.g. [1990 TO 1999] prints as "[1990 TO 1000]", so parseShape rejects the printed string ('Wrong order') or reads it as a much shorter range ([* TO 1999-12-31] prints as "[* TO 1000]")
Finding LFV-610Area: spatial-extras / prefix trees (DateRangePrefixTree / NumberRangePrefixTree range-shape string form: SpanUnitsNRShape.toString of a range whose end normalizes to a thousand- or million-year cell; also shown in the 'queryShape=' part of the prefix-tree queries' toString)Priority: lowImpact: minorNovelty: new
AI-assisted finding, confirmed by automated checks, not yet triaged by a human Lucene committer. This site files nothing upstream.
What it shows
You parse an ordinary date range such as [1990 TO 1999] with DateRangePrefixTree.parseShape and print it, expecting a string that parseShape reads back as the same range, as NRShape#toString promises ('The result should be parseable by parseShape(String)'). Instead it prints "[1990 TO 1000]", which parseShape rejects with IllegalArgumentException 'Wrong order', and [* TO 1999-12-31] prints as "[* TO 1000]" ([1990 TO 2999] as "[1990 TO 2000]"), which parses without error to a range that ends up to 999 years early. Range normalization turns an end of 1999 into the thousand-year cell 1000-1999 (an end of 2 BC into a million-year cell), and the per-cell printer writes a cell as its FIRST year, which is right for a range start but wrong for a range end; searches are unaffected, only the text is wrong.
The test shows that DateRangePrefixTree prints the range [1990 TO 1999] as "[1990 TO 1000]" (the end is printed as the first year of its thousand-year block), so parseShape cannot read back its own toString().
Expected vs actual
Expected parseShape(shape.toString()) to equal the shape (NRShape#toString: "should be parseable by parseShape"); actual: IllegalArgumentException: Wrong order: 1990 TO 1000, with -ea and -da.
Files
Run it
- Tested on Lucene main e1faeba08bde (2026-11-02): still reproduces.
- Tested on Lucene main 645d4fe14a20 (2026-10-28): reproduced.
- Recorded outcome of run 1 on Lucene main 645d4fe14a20: 1 test(s) run, 1 failed.
- How to read the outcome: a failing test is the finding reproducing (the failure message states expected against actual).
- Seeds: a rerun with the same seed replays the same random choices. Assertions off (-da -dsa -Dtests.asserts=false) is the production-like setting.
# Lucene checkout at the tested commit, built with: ./gradlew --no-daemon assemble (JDK 25)
LUCENE=/path/to/lucene; V=12.0.0-SNAPSHOT
CP=$LUCENE/lucene/core/build/libs/lucene-core-$V.jar
CP=$CP:$LUCENE/lucene/codecs/build/libs/lucene-codecs-$V.jar
CP=$CP:$LUCENE/lucene/test-framework/build/libs/lucene-test-framework-$V.jar
CP=$CP:$LUCENE/lucene/spatial-extras/build/libs/lucene-spatial-extras-$V.jar
CP=$CP:$LUCENE/lucene/spatial3d/build/libs/lucene-spatial3d-$V.jar
CP=$CP:randomizedtesting-runner-2.9.2.jar:junit-4.13.2.jar:hamcrest-3.0.jar # test-framework dependencies (Maven Central)
CP=$CP:junit-platform-console-standalone-6.1.3.jar # JUnit Platform console launcher (Maven Central)
javac -d classes -cp "$CP" $(find src -name '*.java')
# run 1: assertions on, seed DEADBEEF
java -ea -esa --add-modules jdk.incubator.vector --enable-native-access=ALL-UNNAMED -Dtests.seed=DEADBEEF \
-cp "classes:$CP" org.junit.platform.console.ConsoleLauncher \
execute --select-class org.apache.lucene.spatial.prefix.tree.TestDateRangeBlockEndToString
The module(s) spatial-extras also need their third-party runtime jars; ./gradlew -p lucene/<module> dependencies lists them.
Gradle alternative: copy the test into the matching module's src/test/ tree of the checkout and run ./gradlew -p lucene/<module> test --tests <class> -Ptests.seed=<seed> (add -Ptests.asserts=false for a run without assertions).
Feedback
Open an issue in lucene-ai-bug-hunt. Please do not open issues or pull requests in apache/lucene about this finding unless a Lucene committer agrees it should be filed.
Snapshot of 2026-11-03. AI-assisted; not yet triaged by a human Lucene committer. Feedback: open an issue in lucene-ai-bug-hunt.