A facet dimension set to DrillDownTermsIndexing.NONE that shares its index field ($facets by default) with term-indexing dimensions makes FacetsConfig emit two schemas for that field, so since 9.0.0 IndexWriter rejects documents of one kind once a document of the other kind is indexed, and after a commit until the index is cleared or rebuilt
Finding LFV-729Area: facet / FacetsConfig drill-down term indexing (DrillDownTermsIndexing.NONE in a shared indexFieldName) vs the core per-field schema check (IndexingChain FieldSchema, FieldInfo.verifySameIndexOptions)Priority: lowImpact: wrong errorNovelty: new
AI-assisted finding, confirmed by automated checks, not yet triaged by a human Lucene committer. This site files nothing upstream.
What it shows
You call config.setDrillDownTermsIndexing("rating", NONE), leave every dimension in the default index field $facets, and index one document with only FacetField("rating", "5") and then one with FacetField("author", "Bob"); you expect both to be indexed, as they are on Lucene 8.9 to 8.11 and as they are when rating gets its own index field. FacetsConfig.build gives the first document a doc-values-only $facets (NONE adds no drill-down terms) and the second a $facets with drill-down terms, and since 9.0 Lucene requires one schema per field, so the second addDocument throws IllegalArgumentException 'Inconsistency of field data structures across documents for field [$facets] of doc [1]. index options: expected 'NONE', but it has 'DOCS'' (with taxonomy facets the reverse order fails the same way). After a commit, a new IndexWriter keeps rejecting documents of the other kind ('cannot change field "$facets" from index options=NONE to inconsistent index options=DOCS') until the index is cleared or rebuilt.
The test shows that with FacetsConfig.setDrillDownTermsIndexing("rating", NONE) and every dimension in the default $facets field, a sorted-set facet document with only "rating" followed by one with only "author" makes IndexWriter reject the second document, because FacetsConfig gives $facets two different schemas.
Expected vs actual
Expected: both documents are indexed. Actual: the second addDocument throws IllegalArgumentException: Inconsistency of field data structures across documents for field [$facets] of doc [1]. index options: expected 'NONE', but it has 'DOCS'.
Files
Run it
- Tested on Lucene main e1faeba08bde (2026-11-02): still reproduces.
- Tested on Lucene main 645d4fe14a20 (2026-10-28): reproduced.
- Recorded outcome of run 1 on Lucene main 645d4fe14a20: 1 test(s) run, 1 failed.
- How to read the outcome: a failing test is the finding reproducing (the failure message states expected against actual).
- Seeds: a rerun with the same seed replays the same random choices. Assertions off (-da -dsa -Dtests.asserts=false) is the production-like setting.
# Lucene checkout at the tested commit, built with: ./gradlew --no-daemon assemble (JDK 25)
LUCENE=/path/to/lucene; V=12.0.0-SNAPSHOT
CP=$LUCENE/lucene/core/build/libs/lucene-core-$V.jar
CP=$CP:$LUCENE/lucene/codecs/build/libs/lucene-codecs-$V.jar
CP=$CP:$LUCENE/lucene/test-framework/build/libs/lucene-test-framework-$V.jar
CP=$CP:$LUCENE/lucene/facet/build/libs/lucene-facet-$V.jar
CP=$CP:randomizedtesting-runner-2.9.2.jar:junit-4.13.2.jar:hamcrest-3.0.jar # test-framework dependencies (Maven Central)
CP=$CP:junit-platform-console-standalone-6.1.3.jar # JUnit Platform console launcher (Maven Central)
javac -d classes -cp "$CP" $(find src -name '*.java')
# run 1: assertions on, seed DEADBEEF
java -ea -esa --add-modules jdk.incubator.vector --enable-native-access=ALL-UNNAMED -Dtests.seed=DEADBEEF \
-cp "classes:$CP" org.junit.platform.console.ConsoleLauncher \
execute --select-class org.apache.lucene.facet.TestDrillDownNoneSharedIndexField
The module(s) facet also need their third-party runtime jars; ./gradlew -p lucene/<module> dependencies lists them.
Gradle alternative: copy the test into the matching module's src/test/ tree of the checkout and run ./gradlew -p lucene/<module> test --tests <class> -Ptests.seed=<seed> (add -Ptests.asserts=false for a run without assertions).
Feedback
Open an issue in lucene-ai-bug-hunt. Please do not open issues or pull requests in apache/lucene about this finding unless a Lucene committer agrees it should be filed.
Snapshot of 2026-11-04. AI-assisted; not yet triaged by a human Lucene committer. Feedback: open an issue in lucene-ai-bug-hunt.