Intervals.unordered/ordered given the same disjunction twice merge it into one repeated source that the gap-sensitive disjunction rewrite does not look into (RepeatingIntervalsSource.pullUpDisjunctions returns itself), so maxgaps(0, unordered(X, X)) with X = or(b, phrase(c, b)) misses 'c b c b', and maxgaps or phrase over ordered(X, X) miss the same way

Finding LFV-809Area: queries / intervals (gap-sensitive disjunction rewrite of LUCENE-8477 vs repeated equal sub-sources: RepeatingIntervalsSource.pullUpDisjunctions, Ordered/UnorderedIntervalsSource.deduplicate)Priority: mediumImpact: silent wrong resultsNovelty: new

Finding page for LFV-809

AI-assisted finding, confirmed by automated checks, not yet triaged by a human Lucene committer. This site files nothing upstream.

What it shows

You build an interval query that uses the same OR twice, for example maxgaps(0, unordered(X, X)) with X = or(b, phrase(c, b)), and expect what the Intervals.or javadoc promises ('Automatically rewrites if wrapped by an interval source that is sensitive to internal gaps'), so that 'c b c b' matches through b at position 1 followed by the phrase 'c b' at positions 2-3, which do not overlap and leave no gap. Instead, because the two arguments are equal, Lucene merges them into one RepeatingIntervalsSource whose pullUpDisjunctions() returns only itself, so the rewrite never runs, the longer 'c b' alternative is minimized away inside X, and the query returns no hits. maxgaps(0, ordered(X, X)) and phrase(a, ordered(X, X)) miss in the same way, and so does Intervals.analyzedText for the query text 'york york' with a synonym york -> 'new york' (unordered, maxGaps 0) on the document 'new york new york'.

The test shows that maxgaps(0, unordered(X, X)) with X = or(b, phrase(c, b)) misses c b c b, because the repeated X becomes a RepeatingIntervalsSource whose pullUpDisjunctions() hides the or() from the gap-sensitive rewrite.

Expected vs actual

Expected: 1 hit (b at [1,1] and c b at [2,3] are disjoint with no gap). Actual: 0 hits (expected:<1> but was:<0>).

Files

Run it

# Lucene checkout at the tested commit, built with: ./gradlew --no-daemon assemble   (JDK 25)
LUCENE=/path/to/lucene; V=12.0.0-SNAPSHOT
CP=$LUCENE/lucene/core/build/libs/lucene-core-$V.jar
CP=$CP:$LUCENE/lucene/codecs/build/libs/lucene-codecs-$V.jar
CP=$CP:$LUCENE/lucene/test-framework/build/libs/lucene-test-framework-$V.jar
CP=$CP:$LUCENE/lucene/queries/build/libs/lucene-queries-$V.jar
CP=$CP:randomizedtesting-runner-2.9.2.jar:junit-4.13.2.jar:hamcrest-3.0.jar   # test-framework dependencies (Maven Central)
CP=$CP:junit-platform-console-standalone-6.1.3.jar   # JUnit Platform console launcher (Maven Central)

javac -d classes -cp "$CP" $(find src -name '*.java')

# run 1: assertions on, seed DEADBEEF
java -ea -esa --add-modules jdk.incubator.vector --enable-native-access=ALL-UNNAMED -Dtests.seed=DEADBEEF \
     -cp "classes:$CP" org.junit.platform.console.ConsoleLauncher \
     execute --select-class org.apache.lucene.queries.intervals.TestUnorderedRepeatedOrMaxGaps

Gradle alternative: copy the test into the matching module's src/test/ tree of the checkout and run ./gradlew -p lucene/<module> test --tests <class> -Ptests.seed=<seed> (add -Ptests.asserts=false for a run without assertions).

Feedback

Open an issue in lucene-ai-bug-hunt. Please do not open issues or pull requests in apache/lucene about this finding unless a Lucene committer agrees it should be filed.

Snapshot of 2026-11-03. AI-assisted; not yet triaged by a human Lucene committer. Feedback: open an issue in lucene-ai-bug-hunt.