PositiveScoresOnlyCollector inherits its wrapped collector's scoreMode() and setWeight(), so a wrapped sort-by-field TopFieldCollector or TotalHitCountCollector silently gets the wrong hits or count instead of exactly the hits that score > 0 (score-mode leg since 5.1.0, count leg since 9.3.0)
Finding LFV-900Area: core / search collectors (PositiveScoresOnlyCollector; FilterCollector scoreMode and setWeight forwarding; TotalHitCountCollector Weight#count shortcut)Priority: lowImpact: silent wrong resultsNovelty: new
AI-assisted finding, confirmed by automated checks, not yet triaged by a human Lucene committer. This site files nothing upstream.
What it shows
You wrap a collector in PositiveScoresOnlyCollector, whose javadoc says it 'makes sure only documents with scores > 0 are collected' and which Collector's overview says 'wraps any other Collector', and expect the wrapped collector to see exactly the matches that score > 0: in the repro 6 hits for the TermQuery g:y with a TopFieldCollector sorted by a field, and counts 0 for (f:x)^0 and 6 for (g:y)^2 OR (f:x)^0 with a TotalHitCountCollector. Instead the sort-by-field collector receives 0 hits and the counter reports 12 for both queries, because PositiveScoresOnlyCollector, which reads scorer.score() itself, inherits two FilterCollector hooks: scoreMode() reports the wrapped collector's no-score mode, so the search builds scorers without scores and the > 0 test reads placeholder values (0 for TermQuery, so real hits are dropped; a constant positive value for FunctionScoreQuery over MatchAllDocsQuery, so zero-score hits get through), and setWeight() hands the wrapped TotalHitCountCollector the Weight, so it counts whole segments with Weight#count and never goes through the filter. Overriding scoreMode() to return COMPLETE when the wrapped collector needs no scores, and passing on a Weight whose count() returns -1 (or not forwarding setWeight at all), fixes both.
The test shows that PositiveScoresOnlyCollector inherits scoreMode() and setWeight() from FilterCollector, so on a one-document index a wrapped sort-by-field TopFieldCollector loses the positive-score hit and a wrapped TotalHitCountCollector counts the zero-score hit (TestPositiveScoresOnlyCollectorWrapsNoScoreCollector, one test per leg).
Expected vs actual
Expected: 1 hit for TermQuery f:x sorted by field, count 0 for (f:x)^0; actual: 0 hits (expected:<1> but was:<0>) and count 1 (expected:<0> but was:<1>), with -ea and -da.
Files
Run it
- Tested on Lucene main e1faeba08bde (2026-11-02): still reproduces.
- Tested on Lucene main 645d4fe14a20 (2026-10-28): reproduced.
- Recorded outcome of run 1 on Lucene main 645d4fe14a20: 2 test(s) run, 2 failed.
- How to read the outcome: a failing test is the finding reproducing (the failure message states expected against actual).
- Seeds: a rerun with the same seed replays the same random choices. Assertions off (-da -dsa -Dtests.asserts=false) is the production-like setting.
# Lucene checkout at the tested commit, built with: ./gradlew --no-daemon assemble (JDK 25)
LUCENE=/path/to/lucene; V=12.0.0-SNAPSHOT
CP=$LUCENE/lucene/core/build/libs/lucene-core-$V.jar
CP=$CP:$LUCENE/lucene/codecs/build/libs/lucene-codecs-$V.jar
CP=$CP:$LUCENE/lucene/test-framework/build/libs/lucene-test-framework-$V.jar
CP=$CP:randomizedtesting-runner-2.9.2.jar:junit-4.13.2.jar:hamcrest-3.0.jar # test-framework dependencies (Maven Central)
CP=$CP:junit-platform-console-standalone-6.1.3.jar # JUnit Platform console launcher (Maven Central)
javac -d classes -cp "$CP" $(find src -name '*.java')
# run 1: assertions on, seed DEADBEEF
java -ea -esa --add-modules jdk.incubator.vector --enable-native-access=ALL-UNNAMED -Dtests.seed=DEADBEEF \
-cp "classes:$CP" org.junit.platform.console.ConsoleLauncher \
execute --select-class org.apache.lucene.search.TestPositiveScoresOnlyCollectorWrapsNoScoreCollector
Gradle alternative: copy the test into the matching module's src/test/ tree of the checkout and run ./gradlew -p lucene/<module> test --tests <class> -Ptests.seed=<seed> (add -Ptests.asserts=false for a run without assertions).
Feedback
Open an issue in lucene-ai-bug-hunt. Please do not open issues or pull requests in apache/lucene about this finding unless a Lucene committer agrees it should be filed.
Snapshot of 2026-11-04. AI-assisted; not yet triaged by a human Lucene committer. Feedback: open an issue in lucene-ai-bug-hunt.