SharedTermsUniformSplit merges silently drop the postings of fields that a source segment stored under another postings format or another shared-terms group (after a per-field postings mapping change, or addIndexes from an index with another mapping), because STUniformSplitTermsWriter.merge reads only the shared-terms block of the first field with terms in each source segment
Finding LFV-249Area: codecs / SharedTermsUniformSplit postings format (STUniformSplitTermsWriter.merge under PerFieldPostingsFormat and PerFieldMergeState)Priority: mediumImpact: data corruptionNovelty: new
AI-assisted finding, confirmed by automated checks, not yet triaged by a human Lucene committer. This site files nothing upstream.
What it shows
You index fields a and b with a per-field codec, a in SharedTermsUniformSplit and b in the default postings format, then open a new writer whose codec maps both a and b to one SharedTermsUniformSplit instance (PerFieldPostingsFormat records the mapping per segment, and merging segments written under different mappings is supported), add a document and force-merge. You expect every term to be found after the merge, as with any other postings format. Instead the merge reads only a's shared-terms block from the old segment, so b's old postings are never copied: docFreq(b:b1) is 0 instead of 1, the document stays in the index but cannot be found through b, and CheckIndex reports the index clean.
The test shows that a SharedTermsUniformSplit merge drops the old postings of a field that an earlier segment wrote under another postings format, after a per-field mapping change puts that field into the shared-terms group.
Expected vs actual
Expected docFreq(b:b1) to be 1 after forceMerge(1); actual 0 (expected:<1> but was:<0>), with -ea and -da; the document stays but cannot be found through b.
Files
src/org/apache/lucene/codecs/uniformsplit/sharedterms/TestSTUniformSplitMergeMappingChange.java(JUnit test)
Run it
- Tested on Lucene main e1faeba08bde (2026-11-02): still reproduces.
- Tested on Lucene main 645d4fe14a20 (2026-10-28): reproduced.
- Recorded outcome of run 1 on Lucene main 645d4fe14a20: 1 test(s) run, 1 failed.
- How to read the outcome: a failing test is the finding reproducing (the failure message states expected against actual).
- Seeds: a rerun with the same seed replays the same random choices. Assertions off (-da -dsa -Dtests.asserts=false) is the production-like setting.
# Lucene checkout at the tested commit, built with: ./gradlew --no-daemon assemble (JDK 25)
LUCENE=/path/to/lucene; V=12.0.0-SNAPSHOT
CP=$LUCENE/lucene/core/build/libs/lucene-core-$V.jar
CP=$CP:$LUCENE/lucene/codecs/build/libs/lucene-codecs-$V.jar
CP=$CP:$LUCENE/lucene/test-framework/build/libs/lucene-test-framework-$V.jar
CP=$CP:randomizedtesting-runner-2.9.2.jar:junit-4.13.2.jar:hamcrest-3.0.jar # test-framework dependencies (Maven Central)
CP=$CP:junit-platform-console-standalone-6.1.3.jar # JUnit Platform console launcher (Maven Central)
javac -d classes -cp "$CP" $(find src -name '*.java')
# run 1: assertions on, seed DEADBEEF
java -ea -esa --add-modules jdk.incubator.vector --enable-native-access=ALL-UNNAMED -Dtests.seed=DEADBEEF \
-cp "classes:$CP" org.junit.platform.console.ConsoleLauncher \
execute --select-class org.apache.lucene.codecs.uniformsplit.sharedterms.TestSTUniformSplitMergeMappingChange
Gradle alternative: copy the test into the matching module's src/test/ tree of the checkout and run ./gradlew -p lucene/<module> test --tests <class> -Ptests.seed=<seed> (add -Ptests.asserts=false for a run without assertions).
Feedback
Open an issue in lucene-ai-bug-hunt. Please do not open issues or pull requests in apache/lucene about this finding unless a Lucene committer agrees it should be filed.
Snapshot of 2026-11-04. AI-assisted; not yet triaged by a human Lucene committer. Feedback: open an issue in lucene-ai-bug-hunt.